Tag: 2024

Nosferatu (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Since Robert Eggers latest movie “Nosferatu” was released in the UK January 1st 2025, for me it is the first movie of this year. To many of my readers though it will have been the last movie of 2024 since it arrived Christmas day for the US and a few other territories. Sadly that means my review is behind everyone else. It also means it missed out on my “Best of 2024” list. But in my view it’s viable for 2025 with that release date. We’ll see where I place it next December. Anyway, this is written and directed by Robert Eggers. Jarin Blaschke provides cinematography and Robin Carolan the music. This is of course a remake of the 1922 silent movie, which was effectively an unofficial adaptation of Bram Stokers Dracula.

Bill Skarsgård stars as “Count Orlok”, the titular Nosferatu. This monster has established a psychic bond with Lily-Rose Depp’s “Ellen Hutter” and concocted a scheme to bring his reign of terror to Germany so that he can “Be one” with her. This also involves getting rid of her new husband “Thomas Hutter” (Nicholas Hoult). Fortunately for him Hutter is a solicitor and estate agent and so he can kill two birds with one stone by inviting Hutter to his castle to sign the deed to his new estate in Germany. Anna meanwhile continues to be haunted by dreams of this dark figure she likens to death itself. As the menace draws near her doctor seeks the assistance of Professor Albin Ebernhart Von Franz (Willem DaFoe) a controversial expert in the occult.

Gothic Horror is Back

This is a visually and sonically stunning movie. Not a huge surprise from Eggers, but he really has outdone himself with this one. Almost every scene has beautiful cinematography. Eggers makes great use of framing in his shots that really gives everything the look of a painting. He’s also clearly spent a lot of time watching old universal horror films and of course the original Nosferatu. The technique of using what you don’t see to build terror is at near perfection here. But as great as the visuals are, the movie is perhaps more impressive sonically. The use of the intense soundtrack, the frightening way Count Orlok speaks and strategic silence really helps to build the ominous tension and really make you feel in the presence of absolute evil.

It’s not all positive though. Eggers skills possibly don’t stretch to getting child actors to not really feel like children trying to act. The two children in this story were distractingly bad. Fortunately their roles were minor and effectively limited to two scenes (Well two where they had dialogue anyway). The second, larger problem is the plot. It’s not that it is a bad story, far from it. Since it is effectively Dracula it is arguably the most successful horror story ever written. But that is the problem right there. If you haven’t lived under rock your entire life you’ve definitely seen this story (Or something similar) before. Horror fan and/or a movie buffs have probably seen it at least ten times, maybe as many as fifty times. That is a problem.

Dreams And Nightmares

Despite the fact I’ve seen this story many times, the way Eggers approaches it is still unique. The heavy focus on dreams and the way they mesh with reality has always been one of his trademarks. Here he uses it in perhaps his best way yet. Having an evil that can be more of a presence through dreams without having to run around everywhere fits Gothic Horror perfectly. The genre has always been more about implying evil than showing it plainly. The idea is to give the viewer a sense of dread and Nosferatu has that in spades.

Where I wonder if Eggers does perhaps have a weakness, is in directing actors. This is a hard one to judge. The child actors were grating, but a few of the others felt a bit dodgy too. Notably, Aaron Taylor-Johnson felt a bit… off. Lily-Rose Depp though by contrast, was particularly good. Unsurprisingly Willem DaFoe, Nicholas Hoult, Bill Skarsgård and Emma Corrin all did great. But actors of that caliber don’t need that much guidance from a director. It’s when you look outside those names that I start to wonder. That’s not to say anyone was outright terrible though. Even the children, they were just notable by contrast. Put a pin in this one for now.

Remakes Worth Remaking

While I’m not normally a big remake fan, this is one that was definitely needed. After all, I think 100 years is more than enough time to warrant a second go. But since the soundtrack was so important to this film, it is very much justified as an improvement over it’s silent predecessor. It also goes some way to make amends for the shoddy way the original was treated. That is would be a whole separate can of worms, so suffice to say the Bram Stoker estate wasn’t best pleased with the unofficial take on Dracula. Yet it wasn’t until Christopher Lee took on the role that anyone played a more menacing vampire than Max Shreck. This film returns Orlock to the head of the table as scariest vampire.

But speaking of remakes, I can’t help but wonder what “A Nightmare on Elm Street” would be like if made by Francis Eggers. I mean sur,e he’d probably set it in Victorian England or something, but I don’t know anyone that has made so much of an art out of dreams, hallucination and madness. If ever there was a director outside of Wes Craven that could actually do a good Nightmare on Elm Street movie, I think Eggers is the man for the job. He would need the right cast though. I’m not sure the director is as good with the actors as he is with everything else. But, he has always been lucky in finding the best talent to work with.

Conclusion

When it comes to horror it is often down to personal taste. This however, is a film every horror fan can appreciate at least on the audio/visual level. Where opinions may vary is on the story. Gothic romantic horror isn’t a wide field as far as story tropes go and when you are remaking a 102 year old movie based (unofficially) on a 107 year old novel no take will ever feel totally original. However, we all knew what this was going in. Also, you don’t really watch Eggers for the story. That’s not a criticism, it’s just he creates atmosphere like no other director. That is why we watch his movies. That and his incredible attention to accuracy and detail. This is his best so far and it’s worth noting, every movie he releases is his best so far. I can’t wait for his next. This one is in the clouds at 8.5/10.

Rating: 8.5 out of 10.

The 2024 Wrap Up – Part Two

Posted on by fenrisfil

Welcome to part two of my annual wrap up looking at 2024. In this half I will give you the second half of my top ten movies of the year and look at how things have played out in the box office. I’ll also be encouraging you to give a second look at four movies that you may have marked down as “Not worth bothering with”.

Top Ten (Part Two)

First up, a couple more honourable mentions. A movie that really surprised me in 2024 was “In The Land Of Saints And Sinners“. There’s no getting around it, Liam Neeson has been making a lot of truly terrible movies of late. This one however was great and Neeson was back on top form. Another impressive comeback was Kevin Costner’s passion project “Horizon: An American Saga“. A long complex tale that would have been better served as a TV series, but was still quality cinema. Costner often self funds his projects and usually loses money with them, but no one can deny his dedication and passion.

Before I get on to my top five movies I want to shout out two 2024 movies I won’t get to see until 2025. Namely: Sonic 3 and Nosferatu. The first two Sonic movies were far better than I think anyone expected and I have no reason to think they will drop the ball now. Meanwhile Francis Eggers new horror movie hits theatres in the US on Christmas day. In the UK we get it Jan 1st 2025. So while Sonic my miss out on the list for both years, I suspect I may be justifying Nosferatu’s inclusion on my 2025 list instead. We will see. Early reviews have been glowing.

#5 Boy Kills World

Review (From a roundup) HERE. This is my fun cult movie of the year. A mixture of excessively violent action and comedy, done with the freedom of an independent movie aiming to be a cult classic. This is a revenge film about a deaf, mute played by Bill Skarsgård but with H. Jon Benjamin (Archer, Bob’s Burgers) as the voice in his head. Sadly the movie was marketed so poorly a lot of people are probably hearing about it for the first time in this article. It made only $3m against its $20m budget. However, cult movies like this tend to make up for their box office in the long term through streaming and physical media sales. So there is hope for it yet. If you like action comedies check this one out! This just about made a 7/10.

Rating: 7 out of 10.

#4 Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F

Legacy sequels usually are a disappointment. Even when they are decent, they tend to fall far short of the original films. Every now and then though we get one just about up to scratch. Perhaps not as good as the classics, but one that does feel part of the same conversation. Axel F was one of these. A very pleasant surprise, especially after the very disappointing legacy sequel to “Coming to America”. Eddie Murphy was back on form. The rest of the gang was back on form and the movie carried a lot of the same vibes while also not ignoring the massive time gap. This was a very solid 7/10.

Rating: 7 out of 10.

#3 Late Night With The Devil

Review (From a roundup) HERE. While perhaps not as original as many may think, it was original enough to stand out in the sea of modern horrors. The 70’s TV style felt authentic and they had fun playing the plot out through that medium. The movie reminded me a lot of “WNUF Halloween Special”, but slicker (Hence not finding it totally original). David Dastmalchian, a highly underrated actor, did a fantastic job in the lead and young Ingrid Torelli impressed as the possessed child. While I wasn’t surprised the movie was good, I was that it ended up my top horror of the year. Well done Shudder! Strong 7/10 for this.

Rating: 7 out of 10.

#2 The Wild Robot

Review (From a roundup) HERE. This was a shocker that really shouldn’t have been. When you realize this is from Dreamworks and Chris Sanders, the minds behind the original “How to Train Your Dragon” you realize expectations should have been high. Yet this flew under a lot of peoples radars for some reason. Perhaps because Lupita Nyong’o isn’t that big a star (Despite her talent). Perhaps because Pedro Pascal seems to be in everything and due to that also has no draw. But the truth is both of them did a superb job. But it’s the animation, the story and perhaps above all the humour that makes this an absolute classic. 7.5/10

Rating: 7.5 out of 10.

#1 Deadpool & Wolverine

Full review HERE. Speaking of humour, by far the funniest film of the year was Deadpool & Wolverine”. So despite the paper thin plot and obvious milking of nostalgia, this still ends up my movie of the year. The cast of heroes is excellent, including the surprise (And not so surprising) cameos. Aside from Emma Corrin, the villains were less impressive, but they did what they needed to. Right from the very start, the movie is outrageous, hilarious and action packed. It even manages to tell strong character stories, compensating largely for the weak plot. Those stories extend beyond the main two characters and makes each cameo feels worthwhile (Although one of them mostly for comedy…Don’t skip the post credit scene, that’s all I’m saying). This was an 8/10, even with the flaws.

Rating: 8 out of 10.

Second Chance Saloon

These days negativity about entertainment spreads like wildfire. There’s no getting around it, the studios have a PR problem and a terrible relationship with their fans. Part of that is because they have been strangely antagonistic and part is just their uninspired output. Most new movies or TV shows are filled with all the same modern cliches. Any criticism of the product is reacted to with insults and labels. So it’s understandable people are increasingly walking away from new shows, movies, franchises or even entire genres. Of course that means on occasion they don’t give a chance to something perhaps they may enjoy. So in this section I am going to recommend a few movies for a second chance.

Let’s get to the easier sells first. I want to mention a couple of fun movies that while not bothering my top ten, were entertaining and didn’t contain anything that anyone should find offensive. “Red One” quickly flopped at the box office, showing that neither The Rock nor Chris Evans are box office gold. Yet, this was a fun, well meaning action Christmas movie. The second to mention is Gladiator 2. This is a direct sequel to the original and an entertaining movie that attempts to offer a subversion of the plot from the first. Sadly some reviewers have thrown out the usual complaints: Bad CGI, ‘Member berries, rehash of the first film. None of those are anywhere near as bad as presented. The plot especially is mostly similar because it is a gladiator movie. Not too much variety in the genre.

Not For Everyone

So now we get on to the divisive movies. First up is Joker: Folie à Deux, this is a movie that got a savage backlash mostly from people that hadn’t seen the movie, but had heard things they didn’t like about it. It’s a subversive movie and a gritty, depressing neo-noir. It’s not a bad movie objectively speaking. Indeed, it is very well made. What it isn’t much of though, is fun. If you go in expecting a comic book movie, you will hate it. Especially true if you think this is the “Real” Joker. But if you like gritty, depressing neo-noir’s or can enjoy a movie for being well made, give it a chance. Personally, I’m not a fan of the musical stuff, but it wasn’t a deal breaker.

Second movie I want to mention is Francis Ford Coppola’s Megalopolis. As you will learn in my review, it’s not a movie you can approach in a straight up way. You pretty much have to ignore the movies plot, take the subtext lightly and look deep at the subtext to the subtext or the metaphor under the metaphor. If you watch the movie thinking of it as being about Coppola himself and film making in general, it becomes a lot more interesting. It’s not for everyone though. Both these films are for true cinephiles. People at film school will probably appreciate them, but if you want to chill with a beer and some popcorn… Yeah, maybe don’t watch these. But then that’s where Red One and Gladiator II come in. So whatever kind of viewer you are, two of these films should be worth giving a chance to.

Box Office Breakdown

So finally we are on to the objective part of this round up. What movies actually made money. This year the top ten global box office contains ten franchise movies. Yep, not a single one of these is an original movie. This is pretty normal for these days and part of the reason why movies are starting to struggle. There isn’t enough effort put in by the studios to build new franchises. Not that there aren’t original movies, but they are usually lower budget, less pushed by the studios and often direct to streaming. Anyway here is the top ten in the global box office for the year 2024.

  1. Inside Out 2 – $1.7b (“Break Even” Aprox $600m) $1.1b Profit (Aprox)
  2. Deadpool & Wolverine – $1.3b (“Break Even” Aprox $600m) $700m Profit (Aprox)
  3. Despicable Me 4 – $969m (“Break Even” Aprox $400m) $569m Profit (Aprox)
  4. Moana 2 – $804b (“Break Even” Aprox $600m) $204m Profit (Aprox)
  5. Dune: Part Two – $708m (“Break Even” Aprox $600m) $108m Profit (Aprox)
  6. Wicked – $593m (“Break Even” Aprox $900m) $300m loss (Aprox)
  7. Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire – $569m (“Break Even” Aprox $450m) $119m Profit (Aprox)
  8. Kung Fu Panda 4 – $548m (“Break Even” Aprox $300m) $248m Profit (Aprox)
  9. Venom: The Last Dance – $470m (“Break Even” Aprox $330m) $140m Profit (Aprox)
  10. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice – $450m (“Break Even” Aprox $300m) $150m Profit (Aprox)

Analysis

Only the first two of this list broke a billion, same as last year. Indeed post covid that is the average. Pre covid it was around 5 per year. With high inflation and ticket prices increasing even beyond that, we should be seeing more not less. In 2014, “Interstellar”, an original movie and the 10th highest earning that year made $653m. If you adjust for inflation that would be around $871m. That would place it 4th on this years list. Of the $200m+ production budget club, only the top three of this year could be called a success. The other wins are for those films that controlled their budgets. Kung Fu Panda 4 being most notable. “Wicked”, despite it’s success is still a financial failure (Offset a little by it’s strong US box office).

The top ten this year is fairly predictable. These are all fairly safe bets outside of perhaps the Dune sequel and of course, all franchise movies. Dune II was only in the air because the first movie came out during covid and as a result didn’t give us a clear indicator of popularity. However, the cinema is largely starved of proper science fiction blockbusters these days and clearly there is still a market. We will almost certainly see more entries from nine of these in the years to come. Venom. however. is done now along with Sony’s Spider-Man-less Spider-Man films. Outside of the Venom movies that universe has been a total failure and it’s unlikely Venom 3 will have made up for the losses of “Madam Web” and “Kraven”, both apparently in the running for worst superhero movie of all time.

Final Notes

By contrast to the box office, my top ten of the year only included four franchise movies. One of which, “The Fall Guy” was a reboot of an 80’s franchise and so could hardly be said to be a cynical cash in. Most people forgot that 80’s series existed. That’s not the case with Beverly Hills Cop, that was very much a cash in on Nostalgia, but it was done very well and deserves it’s place on the list. That’s the thing, there’s nothing wrong with legacy sequels or franchises, but they shouldn’t totally dominate the blockbuster side of the movies. One of the reasons the modern era is so reliant on the IP’s is because almost no one watches movies for the actors anymore. The age of the movie star is long gone. But with it, the freedom to take chances with the actual movies.

In the social media age, I’m not sure you can have movie stars. So that means studios need to be willing to take more risks with the films themselves so they can create the franchises of the future. It’s not all bad news though. There are good films out there, they just may require a little bit of digging around to find. How many of my top ten did you even hear about this year? What you may not realize is there are a lot more movies being made today than in the 1980’s and we live in the age of instant access. We have more freedom to find the content we like, but with freedom comes responsibility. It’s on us to find that content, we can’t wait for it to come to us. For cinephiles that’s not a problem, but for the general audience? That may be why the box office is still struggling.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

The 2024 Wrap Up (Part One)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Well, here we are approaching the end of 2024. That means it is time for my annual wrap up. This year I am covering my top ten movies of the year, along with some honourable mentions. I’m also going to cover some of my favourite documentary and TV shows of the year. Part two will continue my top ten, suggest a few overlooked movies worth a second chance and have a look at the years box office. Hopefully between all that, I’ll give you a few suggestions that may have passed you by.

My Top Ten (Part One)

Honorable mentions first. Let’s start with the body horror “The Substance“. A film that tries to be more artistic than it needed to be, but ultimately unique and very well done. “Strange Darlings” is another horror worthy of mention. The psychological psycho movie relies a bit too much on it’s twist and the chopped up timeline, but is well acted and brutal. More of the fun and low budget side is the prog-rock comedy horror “Destroy All Neighbors“. Ridiculous, but had me in stitches, more for the prog-rock parody than the Troma style horror.

2024 gave us a good amount of solid popcorn action movies too. “Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire” for example is easily the best American Godzilla movie. They learned from the mistakes of the previous movies in the franchise and finally nailed the formula. Also worth mentioning are “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes“, Guy Ritchie’s “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” and “The Beekeeper“. All flawed, but fun movies, with plenty of action and well worth a watch. Now on to the top ten!

#10 Saturday Night

First on my list is the high paced, frantic comedy “Saturday Night”. Full review can be found HERE. Despite never actually having watched the show, I know many of the more famous sketches and am a big fan of a lot of the comedians that made their name on the show. So while I wasn’t viewing this as a fan, I had a lot of interest and it didn’t fail to entertain. It is both a fascinating look behind the scenes of one of the most important comedy shows of all time and funny in its own right. The highlight for me was the performances of the actors playing the roles of these very famous characters. They were all pretty much nailed and that earned this a 6.5/10

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

#9 Arthur The King

Review (From a roundup) HERE. Another movie I wasn’t expecting to land in the top ten, but at the same time it is a heart warming story with a dog. It’s an easy sell to most people. It’s also very well made and since it’s based on a truly story, all the more compelling. The movie has a number of random changes from the true story that inspired it. That would be fine, but a lot of the changes didn’t really add anything, so just seem strange. Of course until you look up the true story, you wouldn’t even know that. If you want a compelling tearjerker, check this out. 6.5/10.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

#8 The Fall Guy

I still don’t know what made anyone think rebooting the 80’s TV series “The Fall Guy” as a comedy action movie in 2024 was a good idea. However, it turns out it actually was a good idea! Ryan Gosling nailed the role and the movie became both a fun action movie and a fairly heartfelt tribute to movie stunt men. They even dropped in a cameo from Lee Majors and Heather Thomas (Stars of the old show). This movie reminds me of the Miama Vice one (Which did a similar end of movie cameo for the originals). Good, entertaining, but probably will be forgotten in a few years if they don’t follow it up. 6.5/10.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

#7 Dune: Part Two

Full review HERE. Now this is a movie I did expect to be on this list. What is a surprise is that it didn’t make the top five. But there I had a lot of issues with this movie, especially in the area of the characters and the emotional connection to the events. I felt very detached as I watched this movie and yet the spectacle is certainly impressive. Villeneuve continues to be a mixed bag for me and not the infallible auteur some seem to think he is. I will never consider his Blade Runner sequel a good movie and a lot of the issues with that he had here too. That said, this is still my sixth favourite movie of the year. No one can say that Villeneuve is a bad director, I just disagree on how good he is. This was a 6.5/10 for me.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

#6 Juror #2

Clint Eastwoods final (Probably) movie as a director is a court room drama with a twist of neo-noir. This hit theatres recently, but had a very short run (Blatantly to qualify for Oscar consideration) and is already on streaming. Court room dramas are strange beast, on the surface you expect them to be boring but once they get rolling they are among the most compelling dramas you can watch. This particular court room drama is very much in the style of “Twelve Angry Men”, which means a lot of the film is twelve strangers in a room talking. This is the kind of thing that is difficult to pull off unless you have good actors, a good script and a good director. No worries here though. I only just saw this one so there may be a full review at some point. Since I don’t have a review, let’s call this a very strong 6.5/10.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

Documentaries

There have been a number of interesting documentaries released this year and I have to give a shout out to a couple. “Jim Henson Idea Man” was both interesting and emotional. We all love the muppets and if you grew up any time before the late 90’s you were probably impacted by at least one of his creations. Maybe The Dark Crystal, maybe Labyrinth, Maybe the Muppets. This is a pretty thorough documentary and I felt like you really get to know the man behind the creations. Definitely worth checking out.

One documentary though ended up an even more emotional journey and that is “Super/Man“. The Christopher Reeves documentary is focused mostly on his life after he became paralysed, but also covers his ground breaking role as Superman in. It is a reminder that while we generally separate the art from the artist, every now and then an actor comes along that so totally embodies the character they are playing it becomes impossible to separate the two.

TV Shows

On the TV side I have less recommendations as I don’t watch as much TV as I do movies. I have continued to thoroughly enjoy “Cobra Kai” in its final season. If you still haven’t explored this show, now is the perfect time. This is how you do a legacy sequel. Another favourite returning in 2024 was Sylvester Stalone’s “Tulsa King“. The shows second season provided both a good stand alone arc and a satisfying continuation of the story lines from season one. The year also saw the third season of the horror/mystery series “From” and the show continues to be good while offering something that looks very much like momentum and direction. I feel like we are going somewhere here, but then I’ve been fooled before (i.e. “Lost”)

One new show I enjoyed this year was the Rome based “Those About to Die“. It’s not the masterpiece that “Rome” was, it doesn’t have as much intrigue as “I Claudius” and it’s not as action filled as “Spartacus: Blood and Sand”. Instead it lands somewhere in between. What makes the season work is the immensely talented Iwan Rheon. A show I was more anxious about than excited was “Fallout“. However, the end result was actually a lot of fun and true to at least the Bethesda versions of the game (Which means, the lore is somewhat flexible). There’s plenty you could pick apart here, but they did pretty much nail the mix of grim reality, grey morality, retro 50’s sci-fi and outright comedy the franchise is known for.

Best TV Show of the Year

As I mentioned, I don’t watch anywhere near as much TV as I do movies. So before I get on to my favourite show of the year, I want to mention a few that are on my list to watch and that my friends and family have loved. First up is the Samurai Epic “Shōgun“. A new adaptation of the 1975 novel by the same name by James Clavell. Another popular show is Guy Ritchies “The Gentlemen“. I was a fan of the movie it follows on from and it seems the like series is close to that in quality. A few more names I’ve heard a lot include: “The Day of the Jackal“, “Masters of the Air” and “Three Body Problem“.

The best TV series I have seen this year is easily “The Penguin“. The reaction to the movie “The Batman” was lukewarm at best, but everyone did pretty much agree that Collin Farrell was great as The Penguin in his all too short cameo. The idea of a spin off series from that based on Penguin seemed like a bad idea with an outside chance of being great. Well, they landed on that outside chance! Farrell of course was great, but so is his supporting cast and the story itself. What stands out, is this is not yet another villain being turned into an anti-hero. Penguin is definitely a bad guy.

End of Part One

That’s it for part one. I’ll be back with my top five movies of 2024 and box office breakdown in a few days.

Review Roundup – December 2024

Posted on by fenrisfil

It’s been a while since I did a review roundup. But I’m back with three movies from this year to check out. These are basically family/kids movies. Seems appropriate for the holiday. All three of these movies will entertain kids and may entertain adults too. First up we have that other Ryan Reynolds movie that came out this year “IF”, then we have the first Transformers animated movie since the 80’s with “Transformers One” and finally I have “The Wild Robot”, you won’t want to miss that one I promise.

If

First up is the imaginary friend comedy “If”, also known as the other movie with Ryan Reynolds that came out this year. This is the latest release from Writer/Director John Krasinkski, so I’m not the only one switching from horror to family movies. Krasinki of course was the man behind the “Quiet Place” franchise. While Quiet Place had a relatively small cast, this one is exploding with named talent including Reynolds, Louis Gossett jr., Steve Carell, Emily Blunt, Blake Lively, Matt Damon and others. The leads though are Reynolds and Cailey Fleming as young Bea, the films protagonist.

12 Year old Bea moves into her grandmother Margaret’s apartment in New York while her father waits for heart surgery in the same hospital where her mother died of cancer years earlier. Naturally she is worried, but her father uses humour to try and raise her spirits. On her way home one day she spots a strange creature and follows it to another apartment in the same block. She discovers a whole load of strange creatures and a strange man that lives there called “Cal” (Reynolds). Bea learns these are imaginary friends that have been shed by their child and that Cal is trying to find them all new children to attach to. Bea as someone able to see all of them is the perfect person to help.

Then

This is a visually imaginative and interesting movie. Each imaginary friend is distinct and unique and their world is weird and wonderful. Unfortunately, most of this was shown in the trailer and the movie itself adds almost nothing. If you have seen the trailer, you have seen pretty much all the characters. Each basically comes with a joke and so you’ve seen that too. They are all painfully one dimensional and frankly so are most of the human characters in this story. That said, it does have heart and maybe that is enough for some people.

The plot though is paper thin and none of the characters (Even the usually charming Reynolds) bring much vitality to the story. The story features a twist at the end that everyone will have predicted by the time it is revealed. That isn’t a deal breaker though, not all twists fail just because you guessed them. That said, this movie is more interesting for the vast list of actors that Krasinski convinced to do voice cameos than for the story itself. You won’t even be aware of many of cameos until you see the credits. But it’s still impressive, as is Krasinski’s imagination. But imagination alone doesn’t create a good movie

Ultimately this is a kids movie. As such it may entertain young children on the strength of the visuals alone. It is heartwarming in places, but offers very little in the way of memorable humour or compelling storytelling. . This is a 5.5/10, recommended only if you have kids and want a heartwarming, visually interesting movie. Everyone else should probably just skip it.

Rating: 5.5 out of 10.

Transformers One

Next up is the new Transformers animated movie. The first such release since the original Transformers movie from 1984. While that film was a huge success, this one didn’t do well in the box office. It did however garner good reactions from those that went to see it. I was always going to be a lot harder to please however, since I grew up in the golden age of Transformers and am very much a G1 Purist. I had all the comics, a huge amount of the toys and of course watched the cartoon. This film however is technically in the Michael Bay continuity and that’s already a mark against it. This time around they’ve drafted in a formidable voice acting cast including “The Avengers” Chris Hemsworth and Scarlett Johansson.

Set an undisclosed amount of time before the Michael Bay transformers movie, the story depicts the origin story of Optimus Prime, Megatron and many others. In this world Cybertronians are forced to live beneath the surface of their planet and mine for Energon. Supposedly because the Matrix of Leadership has been lost and without that the energon seas have all dried up. The alleged loss happened during a battle with the Quintessons, where all but one of the “Primes”, the most powerful cybertronians were slain. Two friends and lowly miners without transformation cogs Orion Pax and D-16 stumble upon the truth behind the story and their fates and the rest of Cyberton’s are forever changed. But while their stories began on the same path they will diverge radically and the friends will become the bitter enemies Optimus Prime and Megatron.

Teenformers

This is very much Transformers for teenagers. Some reviews are suggesting the characters are deeper and more nuanced than ever, but that is nonsense. These characters are generic MCU type characters. Ironic, considering the voice cast. Every male character starts as goofy comic relief with the exception of Alpha Trion. The only reason he isn’t goofy is because he’s the wise old mentor and exposition guy. By contrast all two female characters (Always a minority in this franchise) are overly serious and efficient. This is almost exactly the same set of characters as we saw in the D&D movie and any number of other action based films since the rise of the MCU. It’s a cliche, We really need a lot more variety with movie characters in action/adventure type stories. Especially when it comes to the women as this archetype has literally no charm.

Now one odd thing with the goofy characters is this makes the film a comedy and yet I don’t think the Michael Bay movies were meant to be comedies. Sure they had humour to them, but for the most part they were serious. But that’s not the only reason they don’t fit together. There’s also a second origin story for the Decepticon insignia. I don’t get the obsession with making a Transformer with the insignia for their face but this franchise has now done it twice. First with “The Fallen” and now with “Megatronus Prime”, which is bad twice over. Not only is it explaining something that didn’t need to be explained (Twice!), it means Megatron was just a fanboy for Megatronus Prime. It wasn’t even his name. Definite negative for me.

‘Till All Are One

Despite those negatives, the movie is amusing in places and the action is solid. The voice acting is fine, but really didn’t need the big name actors. The movie probably would have cost a lot less had they just stuck with the same voices that have been playing these characters for decades. The Megatron turn is not out of the blue but it’s not as nuanced as reviews would have you believe. He’s just angry. That’s it. Angry. It works better as an Optimus Prime origin, but not by much. The biggest positive is it does look good visually. I especially liked the Quintessons brief appearance. All told, it was entertaining but it’s not great. 5.5/10. Worth it if you are already a Transformers fan. If not, it won’t win you over.

Rating: 5.5 out of 10.

The Wild Robot

The final movie of this family friendly round up is a “The Wild Robot”, from Chris Sanders and Dreamworks. Sanders previously gave us “Lilo and Stitch” and “How To Train Your Dragon”, so it’s reasonable to have high expectations for this one. The voice cast here is headed up by Lupita Nyong’o, Pedro Pascal (Because it’s mandated by Hollywood that he must be in everything), and relative newcomer Kit Connor. The rest of the voice cast is full of recognizable names. Too many to list, but you’ll likely recognize a lot of the voices. The movie is based on the children’s novel of the same name by Peter Brown.

When a storm causes a Universal Dynamics cargo ship to lose five ROZZUM robot, one unit “7134” finds itself washed ashore of a remote island inhabited by a variety of wildlife. Following her build in directive she sets out to find how she can assist someone. To do so she has to learn their languages, but even then they react with hostility so she decides to return to her factory. After accidentally destroying a bird nest she discovers an egg and decides her task is to protect the egg. When the egg hatches she intends to return to the factory, but is convinced to raise the hatching until it can migrate. Of course things won’t be that simple. She is at least assisted by a Fox, in it for the luxury afforded by befriending a robot helper.

Mother Nature

This is a surprisingly good movie. In some ways it reminds me of Wall-E but this time with anthropomorphic animals. But these animals are only able to talk because Roz learned their languages. It’s obviously a leap to expect the animals to suddenly have human personalities because the robot now can communicate with them. That doesn’t really matter though, it’s still a clever way of reaching the main setup of the movie. But while a robot talking to animals may sounds like childish, it’s worth noting that the cycle of nature of very much at the forefront of this story. Quite a few of the jokes are actually about the reality of predators, prey and the chances of surviving as a wild animal. Playing these for laughs is actually very effective, because it tends to catch you by surprise. But it’s also fundamental to what the story becomes as Roz effectively learns to be a mother.

The Wild Robot has a great flow to it. The funny moments and the emotional ones are well balanced and the occasional action scene maintains a pace. The movie basically keeps you interested the whole way through. While the story has a primary three characters, it gives you just enough personality with the supporting animals and robots for them to feel like genuine, interesting characters. The truth is they are all at their core very simple. Their motivations and personality are somewhat one dimension because they are animals and robots, so of course they are. But the voice acting is able to raise this to a level where they still feel genuine and you actually care about them. The praise for that must be shared between the writers, animators and voice cast.

Conclusion

I delayed watching this movie because frankly I’m bored with Pedro Pascal being in everything. Lupita Nyong’o meanwhile, I was aware of but, largely indifferent to. Her roles in Marvel and Star Wars movies never really gave her a chance to shine. I have to admit though, both did a tremendous job with the voice acting here. Kit Connor I didn’t know at all, but he impressed me too . The animation is top notch as well, but then this is Dreamworks and they tend to put out quality looking features. There’s not really any weak links that I could find.

But while the cast and animation are solid, it is the story that makes the film work. The most important thing is it has heart and is also very funny. It will entertain the kids, it will entertain the adults and some may shed a tear or two along the way. Dreamworks have outdone themselves here. I’ve got to give it a 7.5/10. Highly recommended. So that’s it for the wrap up, two situational recommendations and one must see. Not bad. See you next time!

Rating: 7.5 out of 10.

Saturday Night (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

This is a Docudrama retelling of the hours leading up to the debut of the comedy series Saturday Night Live. This is a show due to hit it’s 50th anniversary next year and has become an established path for comedians to break into the movie industry. Less so in recent years, where frankly it’s reputation has hit rock bottom. It’s worth noting SNL was meant to be a counter culture show, much like “The Simpsons”. But success and longevity tends to turn such shows into the very thing they were meant to culture in the first place. But the list of stars made on that stage in it’s first three decades is long and impressive: John Belushi, Chevy Chase, Bill Murray, Dan Akroyd, Eddie Murphy, Mike Myers, Chris Rock, Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell and Tina Fey to name but ten.

In the UK, we never really got to see the show. It’s only thanks to the internet that I’ve been able to watch some of the most famous sketches retrospectively. I never have watched a full show though. This isn’t unusual for people outside the US, but we all know the movies that those listed above went on to star in. Especially true for those first few. The Blues Brothers, Beverly Hill’s Cop and Ghostbusters are legendary movies. Everyone knows them. So I was definitely curious about this movie. However, I’m not going to have the same affection for a show I never actually watched. The movie is directed by Jason Reitman and stars Gabriel LaBelle as Lorne Michaels, the mind behind the show. He’s joined by a vast ensemble cast, reflecting the real life characters that made the show happen.

Everybody Who is Anybody

Since most of the characters in this story are very well known celebrities the obvious question is how well do the actors nail them? Broadly speaking, I would say very well, at least the characters I actually know (About 75%). Nicholas Braun did double duty playing both Jim Henson and Andy Kaufman. Neither had a lot of screen time, but he nailed both. He could maybe even give Jim Carey a run for his money on Kaufman. Matthew Rhys briefly played George Carlin and felt pretty accurate. The big ones though were Cory Michael Smith as Chevy Chase, Dylan O’Brien as Dan Akroyd and Matt Wood as John Belushi. These were all spot on. Belushi seemed wild and Chase and Akroyd delivered lines exactly like they would in real life. From what I know of their personalities, I feel they nailed that too.

This is a mostly factual account of events. They have squeezed several events that may have happened but not in the run up to the first night into the story. A few events such as Milton Berle getting his dick out didn’t happen at Saturday Night Live. However, he was well known for showing off his meat, so it’s not a total fabrication. That said, this is a frantic movie packed with well known actors, famous characters and crazy events and frankly a lot of it could have been trimmed. Most notably the Berle stuff (Even with J.K Simmons in the role). Possibly a reason why it is there is because he’s considered the worst host the show ever had, so maybe it makes sense to actual fans of the show. The density of the cast also sometimes means it’s not always clear who is who. Indeed I probably missed a few cameos along the way.

Curtains Up

The most important question is of course, is it actually fun. Yes, for sure. It’s not really a film I can see having much replay value though. That’s probably due to the fast pace. The character moments didn’t really land for me and the stakes were a little redundant since I think most people figured the show would make it to air (You know, given the near 50 year run it’s had). So it’s not especially emotional or edge of the seat, but it is fascinating and amusing. I think most people will enjoy it regardless of if you know Saturday Night Live or not. I suspect if you do though, you will get more out of it. Conversely if you are too young to really care about 80’s and 90’s comedy films or know the comedians involved, this may not be for you. For me it just about hit 6.5/10 and largely on the strength of how convincing the impersonations were.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

Gladiator II (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Somewhere near the top of the list of sequels I never expected to see is Gladiator II. But Ridley Scott making a return to the Roman Colosseum was also something I wasn’t going to miss, so here we are. The unexpected sequel see’s Scott return as director but this time around the story is by Peter Craig and David Scarpa instead of David Franzoni. Since most of the characters from the original (And sadly two of the actors) are dead, the only returning ones are Connie Nielsen as “Lucilla” and Derek Jocobi as “Senator Gracchus”. They are joined by Paul Mescal as “Lucius/The Barbarian”, Denzel Washington as “Macrinus”, and Pedro Pascal as “Marcus Acadius”. Dual Emperors Geta and Caracalla are played by Joseph Quinn and Fred Hechinger respectively. John Mathieson returns to cinematography duties. Hanz Zimmer however is replaced by regular Scott colaborator Harry Gregson-Williams for the soundtrack.

Set sixteen years after the events of the original, the movie starts with the roman siege of Numidia and the capture of Roman refugee Lucius Verus (Living under the name “Hanno”). Lucius is enslaved and brought to Rome to be a Gladiator. Sensing something in him he can use to further his ambitions the stablemaster, Macinius promises him revenge against the general that took his city and killed his wife. Things are more complicated than they seem though. That general, Aracius, is actually a good man and married to Lucius’ mother Lucilla. Lucius is actually the heir to Rome and was sent away to protect him when he was a child. Sensing an opportunity, Macrinus tries to manipulate all the sides against each other in an attempt to seize power from the dual Emperors Geta and Carcalla.

The Gates Of Hell Are Open Night And Day

One of the things that made Gladiator so compelling was that it was actually a pretty straight forward yet compelling plot driven by superb ground breaking action and incredible performances from top tier actors, many of which were at their peak (Notable Russel Crowe). It wasn’t a perfect movie, but issues of historical inaccuracies felt unimportant next to such a triumphant performance. This was all wrapped up in one of the best movie soundtracks of all time. So we knew when they announced the sequel there were some pretty big boots to fill. Sequels rarely ever live totally up to the original, though the audiences are wise enough not to expect them to. But it is impossible not to draw comparisons especially given the trend of sequels to constantly reference the originals. This is even more of an issue for those late sequels released decades after the original.

Overcoming that comparison is where this movie fails. As I mentioned, the original had a straight forward plot. A great wrong was done to Maximus. He was betrayed and the rest of the movie is his journey towards righteous vengeance. The story for Gladiator II seems set up to be both a parallel and a subversion of this story. It’s not a bad plot, but it is far more complicated than Gladiator and this reduces the emotional impact of the story. It is a story that would be better suited to a TV series than a film. On top of this, frankly the acting is nowhere near as good. Again, it’s not actually bad and Denzel steals the show, but he had no real competition. The original had Richard Harris, Oliver Reed, Joaquin Phoenix and Russel Crowe all weaving gold. Here Denzel is largely propping the rest of the cast up.

Smooth The Descent

Gladiator 2 has another issue. Creating a story that makes sense as a follow up to one where protagonist and antagonist both died. They just about succeed. Some consider there to be a few too many callbacks, but it makes sense in context and to justify it as a sequel. Scott has taken a lot of liberties with history here, but then he did with the first film too. The story utilizes historical facts and characters, but twists them to fit his tale. It mostly works at least as an alternative history. The movie steals much of the music from the soundtrack of the original too, but this is a positive. The score for the original is famous and memorable. Referencing such music instantly evokes an emotion response. It is a reference that works and doesn’t get in the way of storytelling. Instead it enhances it.

What I can say about the plot is that it is very Roman! Remember all that political maneuvering and backstabbing from Game of Thrones? The Romans invented that. So while I do consider the plot overly complicated for an emotional character driven action fantasy, it entirely fits a story set in Rome. The characters are a bit more of a let down. Outside of the protagonist none of the Gladiators really feel like full characters. The same goes for the Roman senate and the military. Instead the film effectively hyper focuses on three characters: Lucius, Lucilla and Macrinus. Everyone else around them are pretty much just extras including the duel Emperors Geta and Caracalla and Pablo Pascal’s Marcus Acacius. None of them offer anything that memorable in their performance. Pascal seems to be trying, but the audience isn’t really given any reason to care about his character.

Easy Is The Way

Last but not least, let’s talk action. This was a key aspect of the original and it was always going to be vital here too. In this instance the movie doesn’t really make you feel the stakes as strongly, but the spectacle is certainly there. Of all the movies aspects this comes closest to the quality of the original. The only problem is this is 24 years later and we’ve seen a lot of spectacle since then. Indeed just recently the TV series “Those About To Die” had the Colosseum filled with water. The set piece in that series was a simple execution and not a battle, but it does make the spectacle feel less ground breaking. Still, I was happy with the quality of the action and the effects. It was as good as I hoped.

So on to the verdict then. Ultimately this is a good film, but it’s not a classic like the original. If it was a stand alone movie it wouldn’t make my physical media collection but as a sequel it is just about good enough for a double bill. While the story is a little over complicated and the acting and characters a little under whelming, I was reasonably gripped for the duration (Two and a half hours, about the same as the first film). Denzel Washington does a good job of propping everyone else up and is the glue that keeps this warship sailing. It all just about works. It just doesn’t excel. So I’m giving this a firm 6.5/10.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

Alien: Romulus (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

October may be over, but I have one more horror review for you before I move on to other things. This one comes a little late, but unlike others I wasn’t overly enthusiastic about this movie. I’m talking of course about the latest addition to the Alien franchise “Alien Romulus”. The trailers had some cool visuals but I had my doubts that this would be anything but a less good version of Aliens, updated with a few modern cliches. The movie is from director Fede Alvarez and written by Alvarez and Rodo Sayagues. It stars Cailee Spaeny and David Johnson with support from Isabela Merced,

Aliens: Romulus is set between the first two Alien films, which is a little strange on the surface but does fit with the trend of going back to the original movie in these franchises. What is unusual here is it’s not a retcon sequel, everything else is still canon. The story follows colonist Rain Carradine and her friends as they attempt to escape their apparent indentured servitude to the Weyland-Yatani company at a mining colony. To do this their plan is to break into an abandoned space station that is orbiting the planet and steal the left pods so they can utilize their cryo sleep capsules and reach another colony. Unfortunately for them the space station was abandoned for good reason as this outpost has been used to experiment on the infamous Xenomorphs.

In Space No One Can Hear Your Callbacks

I predicted what this film was going to be back when it was first announced. That is basically the same as “Prey” (2022) but for the Alien franchise. A watered down less good version of the movies that worked with endless references from those better movies put in simply for the sake of it. Not a bad movie as such. but it’s like watching a tribute band perform the greatest hits of your favourite artist. The music is good, but given the choice I’d always rather watch the real thing. That’s the difference between tribute bands and this kind of safe overly meta sequel movie, you can’t always see your favourite band. You can however always see your favourite movie. So movies like Prey and Romulus are things you watch once and then go back to only re-watching the first two movies as you have been for decades.

What I didn’t realize was just how much of a greatest hits Romulus would be. It doesn’t just reference the first two movies, it throws callbacks to the more divisive ones. When it does reference the first two movies it lays it on so thick it takes you out of it. This is the very definition of “‘Member Berries”. It is not “Nostalgia done right”, these things are shoehorned in. Actually the elements from the divisive movies are actually done better than the ones from Alien/Aliens, because they do service the plot. This is not a movie created to do something new or interesting with the franchise, it is one designed to get bums on seats in the theatre with little care for if anyone will remember the movie in five years time.

Alien Queens Greatest Hits Vol 2

Nostalgia bait is one thing. But what about the movie in it’s own right? Well, on the positive the music and the sound design are fantastic. I really did enjoy both those elements. Indeed the only callbacks to older movies I liked were the musical ones. Visually the film is mostly good. I say mostly because there is one bit of horrendous CGI. Naturally, this is tied to the pointless nostalgia call backs. The characters inclusion is itself a dumb and lazy plot element but the CGI just makes it embarrassing. Unfortunately, the character is in the film throughout. One of the worst callbacks to past movies includes a particular type of Alien. While the concept is still bad, I think this version looks marginally better.

The characters are a strong weakness for this movie too. Indeed these are just the dregs from an overly dystopian colony that is typical of the unimaginative modern view of the future. In Alien and Aliens while the company had nefarious goals, there was no indication that this film was set in a dystopian future. The crew of the Nostromo were just blue collar working Joes/Janes. They weren’t oppressed, they just weren’t pampered. Romulus though launches us instantly to a universe where the company effectively has slaves, who have no control over their destiny. The Company meanwhile have moved on from nefarious to full mustache twirling villainy. That makes the universe no longer feel real. The characters themselves have no real background to pull from and so feel generic outside of Andy the android and he’s not that much better.

Conclusion

Ultimately this is a movie that does nothing for the franchise. It is pretty, it is loud. Indeed one may say it is full of sound and fury yet ultimately signifying nothing. It has an extreme deficit of creativity and relies on nostalgia and callbacks. I originally thought this would be like Prey, but in many ways it’s more like “Terminator: Dark Fate”. It’s nowhere near as bad, nor does it remove the older films from canon. It does however repeat the same mistakes from those movies that derailed the franchise previously. That said, I did enjoy Romulus more than Prey (Or Dark Fate). That is mostly due to the visuals, sound design and music. It’s not a strong entry in the franchise, but it makes a reasonable popcorn movie. This is a 5.5/10.

Rating: 5.5 out of 10.

The Substance (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

The Substance is a new body horror movie from French writer/director Coralie Fargeat. It was made for a mere $17.5m by Universal through their “Working Title Films” UK subsidiary. It stars Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley with support from Dennis Quaid. The movie has not had a particularly large release, but has done well for it’s budget. Notably though it has had very positive reviews with many calling it the film of the year. So naturally I had to work this into my October horror reviews. Side note, this is my 100th horror review on the blog!

Moore plays “Elisabeth Sparkle”, a fading star that is about to loose her aerobics show due to her age. After being in a car crash a surgeon slips a USB stick into her pocket with a note saying “This changed my life”. On the stick is an advert for a treatment known as “The Substance” that promises to perform miracles. Specifically to create a better version of you that will then share your life. There are rules though, the most important being that you switch every seven days without fail. Being desperate to rekindle her fame and be loved by the audience once more, Elisabeth agrees. Thus “Sue” (Qualley) is born. The instructions warn “Remember you are one”, but that may be easier said than done.

Every Seven Days Without Fail

This is a film that heavily indulges in itself. Everything is heavily stylized, but each shot hangs on a few moments more than it needs to and the arty stuff is thrown in almost every second. The style is actually good, but the film milks each idea for far too long. This leads to the main problem with the film it is far too long. You just don’t need two hours and twenty one minutes to make a body horror. The story is actually pretty simple and you know where it is going from fairly early on. Dragging out each scene wasn’t really necessary artistically, to tell the story or to enforce the themes.

My other issue with the film is the predictability. Any film that literally lists rules, you know the the direction of the film will be to break every single one of them. It’s just a matter of time (and it’s a long time). The pay off on the last one is pretty impressive though, I’ll give them that. To be fair, body horror tends to be predictable, so this is a minor issue. I did wonder early on if most of the story was meant to be a hallucination after the car crash or even something experienced as Elizabeth died. Neither came to pass, but to be fair also wasn’t ruled out. The truth is this is a film where reality isn’t really important.

You Are The Matrix

The world in which the film takes place doesn’t feel very much like a real world. That’s not a criticism though since this is clearly intentional. But it is a sign of just how much this film is about style and themes. All the characters outside of the main two (who are in fact, one) are shallow shells of characters that don’t feel real. This is because they aren’t important to the story. This is a story about one person and one person alone. One person and two actresses so it’s a good job Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley were up to the task.

To me this seems to all be a metaphor for plastic surgery. More specifically for how it is crutch many Hollywood actresses reach for at a certain age. It’s an unfortunate thing and almost every time they end up looking worse than aging naturally. This movie really looks into this from the perspective of the women that go through it. It is ultimately a tragedy. It’s not an entirely sympathetic one though. It’s also not a film that shies away from the grossness or comedy of a body horror. The former it indulges in throughout, but the latter kicks into gear for the final act. This is an act that wouldn’t be out of place in a Charles Band or Troma horror comedy.

Termination Is Final

This is a good movie, but I’m not sure it warrants the “Best movie of the year” labels it’s been receiving. The ending is more funny than tragic and the movie drags a lot getting there while they show you a few more close ups of peoples teeth or piles of meat. The themes are sort of in your face and the plot is a straight line towards disaster. That is a plot that works, but it’s nothing special. The visuals however are good. The sets, sound design and editing (Length aside) are very impressive. The body horror is sufficiently gross (Which is the entire point) and everything more or less works. So, how do I score this? I think a strong 6/10 is fair. It’s a recommendation, but I do think you need to like body horrors or art movies to enjoy this.

Rating: 6 out of 10.

Longlegs (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

It’s Nick Cage time! Nick has been killing it on the indie and B-Movie scene for the last few years making a mixture of art, comedy and horror (Often at once) and clearly having fun with it. He’s been prolific too, you can pretty much count on 2-3 new Nick Cage films every year and they’ll all have something positive about them. Part of this has been a run of good horror movies. Everything from the crazy “Mandy” (2018), the solid Lovecraft piece “The Color Out Of Space” (2019), fun movies like “Willy’s Wonderland” (2021) and “Renfield” (2023) and recently the dark and underrated “Arcadian” (2024). But “Longlegs” is a movie that had hype long before anyone realized Cage would be in a central role. A number of cryptic trailers certainly helped put the movie on a lot of peoples radar, including myself.

Something Wicked This Way Comes

Longlegs is written and directed by Osgood Perkins. The directors previous feature movie “Gretel and Hansel” was praised for the cinematography and criticised the script. However, since neither the writers nor cinematographer from that movie are involved here that leaves Perkins somewhat of a wild card. The movie stars Maika Monroe as “Agent Lee Harker” a young FBI agent with a somewhat psychic talent and a mysterious dark past which she can’t quite remember. Nicholas Cage plays creepy occultist villain “Longlegs”. Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt and Michelle Choi-Lee fill out the rest of the key cast.

Agent Harker is recruited to a special task force trying to solve the “Longlegs” murders. The murders are unique in that the families all seem to have been murder/suicide situations, but are tied together by cryptic notes left at each scene in the same handwriting and the date of birth of each of the families daughter. Harker immediately is able to make progress on the case but as she does she begins to realize things are a lot more personal to her and her mother than she could ever have guessed.

Atmosphere

The film has a good atmosphere. That is the big selling point. The story breaks down a little bit at the ending, and has some issues throughout but is serviceable. Nick Cage finds another character that allows him to make the most of his skills at playing the unhinged. This time though he pushes for more unsettling than comedic and mostly achieve that. Perkins does a good job of showing only as much of Cage as needed. This keeps the mystery and makes sure that the performance from cage doesn’t cross into “Not the bees!” territory. Maika Monroe’s character on the other hand drifts through the entire film like it’s a fever dream. This is entirely intentional and while it doesn’t ask a lot of the actress she pulls it off well. Alicia Witt is a pleasant surprise here too and as Agent Harkers mother Ruth.

The plot certainly has a lot of interesting elements but it ends up somewhat cluttered. . Because of the dream like state that Agent Harker is in throughout the movie it’s hard to get any kind of emotional attachment to the character. She never actually does any detective work. Instead, all the solutions just magically come to her. It’s fairly clear early on (Perhaps from the start), what the Gotcha will be. When it happens, Harker’s reaction to it remains muted due to her continuing dream like state. It’s not quite the emotional pay off it should be. Her mother has an important roll, but we have no reason to care about her. This is largely because she isn’t introduced properly until half way through the movie.

Final Fate

The movie does spend some time humanizing Agent Carter, though Blair Underwood seems to be mostly phoning it in. It’s also done for somewhat obvious reasons, yet isn’t really effective. When these events pay off I was spending most of my time shouting at the screen for Agent Harker to do the obvious thing and stop standing around drooling instead of caring about what was happening. The ending left me somewhat unsatisfied, where as it should have left me feeling unsettled. I think part of this are that too many elements are introduced to this puzzle late on. The movie should have pushed a feeling of inevitable doom hard from the start.

The ingredients are here for a great movie, but the end result doesn’t quite live up to its potential. It is however a good step forward for Perkins as a director and I hope he builds on this in the future. Overall, while not entirely working the movie scores points for atmosphere and for Nick Cage’s performance. This is a 6/10. If you like atmospheric horror or Nicholas Cage being goofy, it is a recommendation. On the other hand, if you like deals with the devil and big gotcha moments in an atmospheric horror check out the vastly superior Angel Heart instead.

Rating: 6 out of 10.

In A Violent Nature (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

“In A Violent Nature” is a 2024 slasher film with a twist. The movie takes the killer perspective idea (Used so effectively in the intro of “Halloween” (1978)). The movie is written and directed by Chris Nash and is his feature length debut. Chris previous made short films including one entry for “ABC’s of Death 2”. Ry Barrett plays the killer “Johnny” and Andrea Pavlovic plays final girl “Kris”. The story begins with a group of teenagers taking a necklace they find hanging on the remains of a fire tower in the woods. This wakes up long dead killer Johnny who sets out to recover his necklace.

As the story progresses and Johnny starts to kill everyone in his way as he searches for his necklace we gradually learn the killers backstory. As a child he was tricked up to the fire tower where someone scared him and he fell to his death. Later Johnny’s father confronted the killers and dies in the ensuing brawl. The local folk law is that the vengeful spirit of Johnny has been responsible for two killing sprees decades apart. Eventually Johnny narrows his sights on a young woman called Kris and her boyfriend Colt (Cameron Love) who desperately attempt to fight back.

Not Every Idea Is A Good One

This is an attempt to bring some art and perhaps originality to the slasher sub-genre and I applaud the attempt, but for most part the art detract from the atmosphere. Since we are following the silent killer and not the victims, we don’t really get to know any of the characters. I didn’t find myself caring at all about any of them, including the killer. They are all about as generic as slasher film characters come. Some of the scenes are approached in interesting ways but none of this is consistent. We switch from observing a murder quietly from a distance in a detached way, to a horror effects guys wet dream a few minutes later. The ending even abandons the killers perspective gimmick, making it feel tacked on from another film.

While conceptually interesting, in practice this is a movie that falls flat. It feels like the writers just threw together every idea they thought was “Cool”. Then packed it with a vague Jason Voorheese knockoff story. As a result, some of the scenes in isolation are pretty cool (For various reasons). As a full movie however, it’s hard to really feel much of anything for it. While not a complete disaster it is a disappointment. “Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon” (2006), did the killers perspective better admittedly in a more meta and dark comedy way. This was more like someone watched the opening of “Halloween” (1978) and wanted that to be the entire movie. Had John Carpenter done that, I very much doubt we’d still be talking about that movie 46 years later. This is a narrow 5.5/10. It has some merit, but basically one to skip.

Rating: 5.5 out of 10.