1992 Horror Double Bill

Posted on October 29, 2024October 29, 2024 by fenrisfil

As we roll closer to Halloween I’ve decided to up my game and do three double bill reviews. I’ve picked movies that won’t require me to be too verbose in my analysis, but should still be fun. First up is a 1992 Doctor Double Bill. That is I am review the comedy horror Doctor Giggles and the fantasy horror Doctor Mordrid both from 1992. The coincidences don’t stop there though as they both star an actor named Combs. They aren’t related but if you watched TV in the 1990’s you probably recognise them both.

Dr. Giggles (1992)

First up is the horror comedy slasher film “Dr. Giggles” from 1992. Directed by Manny Coto and written by Coto and Graeme Whifler. While Coto may not be the most recognizable name as a director, he has become a regular writer for horror television over the years. His credits include Dexter, American Horror Story and the Exorcist TV series. One instantly recognizable name from the 1990’s in Holly Marie Combs (One of the stars of the TV series “Charmed”) and Dr. Giggles was her first staring role in a feature film. Slashers though are more about the killer than the final girl and here we have Larry Drake playing the titular villain. Larry previously played the villainous “Durant” from the movie “Darkman” (1990).

Thirty Five years after a killing spree by Dr. Evan Rendell resulted in him being shot dead by police, his unhinged son (Drake) has escaped from an asylum and returned to the town of Moorehigh to continue his fathers work. He becomes increasingly obsessed with Jennifer Campbell (Combs), a young woman with problematic heart. The original cause of Dr. Rendell’s killing spree was that his wife’s heart was failing and he became obsessed with giving her a transplant (By killing people and cutting out their hearts). Now his son wants to replace Campbell’s heart and will kill anyone else that gets in his way.

Open Up And Say Arrrrrgh

Slasher movies swarmed the 1980’s, so by the time 1992 rolled around we’d seen pretty much everything. It wasn’t until 1996 when “Scream” added a layer of polish and a big touch of meta-references that the genre started to feel relevant again. With that in mind you can see why this film had mostly negative reviews when it came out. However, we’re a long way from the 80’s now and slashers that don’t try and drop twists, subvert expectations or be self referential suddenly feel sort of fresh.

It helps that Dr. Giggles brings a lot of personality to the table courtesy of Larry Drake’s performance. The methods of killing and the medical puns make him a memorable antagonist. It also helps to have Hollie Marie Combs as the final girl. As well as being a generally good actress, few people feel quite as wholesome as Hollie. That works well for a final girl as it makes you automatically sympathetic. The rest of the cast are somewhat below average and don’t offer anything memorable. They aren’t so bad as to take you out of the movie and most of them are just there for the kill count so this is fine.

The Last Laugh

This is a formulaic yet fun slasher movie. The villain is memorable and has a distinct personality. The final girl is actually a good and recognizable actress (Who achieved fame later) and plays the part well. The kills all fit the theme and there’s even a few good visuals along the way. Against that is a paper thin plot with more than a few holes. That doesn’t get too in the way with a comedy horror slasher so this narrowly earns a 6/10. High than I expected to give this! If you like slashers and/or comedy horror I’m sure you’ll enjoy it.

Doctor Mordrid (1992)

In the early 1990’s Charles Band’s Full Moon Entertainment became quite ambitious. In 1990 they released the movie “Robot Jox”, not a great movie but ahead of it’s time for what it tried to achieve on a modest budget. Marvel meanwhile was not in a great place with it’s movies. It wouldn’t be until 1998’s “Blade” that they started the journey to the modern era of superhero movies. Instead their most recent movies were Dolph Lundgren’s “Punisher” (1989) and 1986’s Howard The Duck. Not movies that set the world on fire. So no shock they were willing to give Band the rights to make a “Doctor Strange” movie. Sadly (Or luckily) those rights expired while this film was in pre-production and Band decided to simply change the names and move forward with it.

Anton Mordrid (Jerffrey Combs) is a wizard tasked by a being called “The Monitor” to protect the Earth from an evil Wizard called Kabal (Brian Thompson). Kabal needs to acquire the philosophers stone and a number of alchemical elements to unleash his minions from the fourth dimension. Mordrid befriends and is assisted by Samantha Hunt (Yvette Nipar), a research consultant to the police. As Kabal gets closer to his goal, Mordrid is suspected by the police of committing the crimes and he must escape custody and meet his nemesis for a final showdown at the Cosmopolitan Museum.

Master Of The Dark Arts

This is one of those horror adjacent movies, simply because it involves dark magic. In truth it’s no more a horror than Charmed or Buffy the Vampire slayer. Brian Thompson, who plays the evil antagonist “Kabal” was a regular on both of those shows and honestly I wouldn’t have been surprised to see the Shannen Doherty or Sarah Michelle Gellar turn up. Brian has one of those combinations of faces and voices that make him perfect villain material. His acting ability was never quite enough to raise him to a higher level and so he became type cast. For a cheap horror though, he’s perfectly adequate. Jeffrey Combs however is actually a much better actor than his long run of low budget horrors and TV shows would suggest. Any time he turns up in a movie like this, the quality raises.

Despite the budget this is a well put together movie with a mostly higher quality level of acting than you may expect. But in typical Charles Band style that is only true of the main characters. Once you reach the bit parts the acting quality drops right down. Again though, not really any worse than an episode of Charmed. Most aspects of this movie are reasonable. They just about get away with the effects at the end of the movie, which were obviously minimized for the sake of the budget. The big problem is the script. It is 50% generic and 50% plain bad. The climax felt sort of random and unearned as did the relationship between the main characters.

It’s A Kind Of Magic

This is film that could have been a lot better even with the special effects limitations of the day. Effectively being a Doctor Strange movie, we have a raw concept we know can work. We have an excellent protagonist, a good leading lady and a villain that slips into the role like a comfy pair of shoes. But then we have a plot that doesn’t seem to have any plans for how to tell a story with these very fine ingredients. The movie is on the short side at a mere 74 minutes, so it’s no surprise it feels like it was just about to get into its stride when BAM it’s over. As a result, the best I can give this is a 5/10. This is basically a TV movie. If you want to see Jeffrey Combs at his best, check out “Re-Animator” (1985) instead. If you are curious about the Doctor Strange movie that never happened it may be worth watching, otherwise give it a pass.

Bloody Hell (2020)

Posted on October 28, 2024October 25, 2024 by fenrisfil

Bloody Hell is a 2020 independent horror comedy from director Alister Grierson and writer Robert Benjamin. It is based on an idea Benjamin came up with while at an airport and is his feature film debut. The film stars Ben O’Toole and Meg Fraser (Also making her debut). Support is from Caroline Craig, Matthew Sunderland and Travis Jeffrey (Playing twins). The movie is mostly set in Finland, even though none of the main actors are finnish and most of the movie was actually filmed in Australia.

Rex (O’Toole), is an ex-military man that has just been released from jail after his heroics in taking out a gang of bank robbers cost the life of an innocent woman. He is seen by some as a hero and others as a villain. Either way his celebrity status is too much for him and so he opts for a fresh start… in Finland. Unfortunately for him he is immediately kidnapped by a family of cannibals and wakes up tied to the ceiling in a basement and missing a foot. Fortunately he is tougher than he looks and he has an ally… the voice in his head.

Hello Me

There are many different flavours of horror comedy around. Some are dark and twisted, others are so heavy on the laughs they barely count as horror. Some lean heavily into B-Movie effects and aesthetics and others are more realistic and rely on fluke and idiocy to create mad situations. That last group is where you’ll find “Bloody Hell”, but it’s a specific sub-flavour of that because it relies on the protagonist being quite unhinged himself. The situation in which he finds himself in should by all rights be terrifying, but because he is talking to an imaginary version of himself that is calmer and more in control, the situation actually becomes a comedic one. It’s quite a clever idea conceptually.

One of the things I noticed with this film is how fast the time went by. In actual fact the protagonist spends most of the film strung up in the basement, but it doesn’t feel like then while you are watching it. Other things go on around him, including flashbacks revealing what happened at the bank. These help break it up, but in actual fact most of the movie is one character talking to himself. We see the voice in his head as a physical manifestation so the scene feels like a genuine conversation. This works surprisingly well and then when the final act kicks off and he breaks free, the action is swift and clever. The pacing is pretty much spot on.

Finnish Him

It’s impossible not to see the influence of Deadpool on this movie or perhaps more accurately Ryan Reynolds. In many ways the movie reminds me of Reynold’s “Voices” horror comedy, which used a very similar trick. In that Reynold’s is a serial killer but the film is framed through his imaginary conversations. Sometimes with his pets and occasionally the dead bodies of his victims. Bloody Hell isn’t quite as funny as Voices, but it does have the scope for sequels. Indeed the film definitely hints at more to come and I hope we see it. O’Toole doesn’t have Reynolds natural wit and charisma on screen, but he does and pretty good job of impersonating it. This was Meg Fraser’s feature debut so her performance was very impressive. It’s worth noting, since none of the cast were actually Finnish, so they had to learn to speak the dialogue for the role.

Overall, this is a smoothly put together movie that works pretty well for what it is. It isn’t overly funny or particularly scary but it keeps you entertained. The protagonist is likeable despite being a little crazy and the action scenes, while minimal, are fun. I imagine the film would drag a little on second viewings but it’s definitely worth watching once. This is a solid 6/10 and a recommendation. Apparently a sequel is being considered, I’ll be there for it!

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)

Posted on September 11, 2024October 9, 2024 by fenrisfil

Legacy sequels are a difficult nut to crack. The vast majority of these films (and occasional shows) are for Gen X franchises. That’s my generation, so I’ll give you my bias up front for that. For a legacy sequel to work it has to appeal to the franchises existing fan base. But Gen X is aging (Believe me, I’m all too aware), so you need to bring in younger generations too. The important thing is you don’t bring them in at the expense of the built in fandom. Indeed the entire point of using these old franchises is that the enthusiasm and love of the existing fans helps to encourage in new ones. Ideally you want parents to introduce the kids, but as long as the general reaction is positive you get a nice momentum boost.

The problem is that quite often these sequels are created by people that either don’t care for the franchise or have a very fringe take and as a result they garner a huge backlash from the original fans and new fans are put off. This is true of remakes/reboots too, but the potential for both success and failure is that much higher with a continuation. The success rate for legacy sequels is marginally better than that for remakes, but still lands under 50%. What tends to weigh things more to the positive is the inclusion of legacy cast members and creatives, so the fact that the new Beetlejuice sequel sees Tim Burton, Michael Keaton and Winona Ryder return had me hopeful this one would join Top Gun, Beverly Hills Cop and Karate Kid in the win list.

Showtime!

Tim Burton returns to the directors chair, with Danny Elfman once again providing the score. Script duties though have been passed to “Wednesday” writers Alfred Gough and Miles Millar (Original writer Michael McDowell died in 1999 and his collaborator Larry Wilson is absent). Keaton and Ryder of course return as the titular character and franchise lead “Lydia Deets” respectively. Catherine O’Hara, returns in her role as “Delia Deetz” (Lydia’s step-mother) and while her husband “Charles” is somewhat present as a character, actor Jeffrey Jones did not return. Ghost couple “Adam” and “Barbara” (Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis) are entirely absent. The primary addition to the cast comes from Jenna Ortega (Fresh off “Wednedsay”) as Lydia’s estranged daughter “Astrid”. She is joined by Willem Dafoe as ghost detective “Wolf Jackson”, Justin Theroux as manipulative douche bag “Rory” and Monica Bellucci as soul sucking seductress “Delores”.

Many years after the events of “Beetlejuice” (1988), Lydia has made a career for herself as a TV Medium, utilizing her ability to see the dead. She is however haunted by visions of Beetlejuice and the events of the first movie has left her somewhat fragile. That didn’t stop her marrying and having a daughter, but after the death of her husband, her relationship with her daughter has become strained and she has found it increasingly difficult to cope. After her father also dies during a tragic plane crash, Lydia, her daughter Astrid and step-mother Deelia return to “Winter River” (Site of the first movie) for the funeral. While there, a series of events unfold that leaves Lydia with only one person to whom she can turn, the devious and outrageous Beetlejuice.

Stitched Together

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is a bit of a mixed bag and that is a shame because the ingredients are all here for what could have been a fantastic legacy sequel. The returning cast settle into their roles as if it was still the 1980’s, Tim Burton is able to indulge in all that quirky gothicness that we love about his style and the film provides what is effectively a female-centric story while avoiding all those modern cliches that tend to ruin that kind of thing. All the characters have their flaws, the heroic ones learn to overcome them and everyone else milks their flaws for entertainment value. They even dealt with controversies with the original cast (The ones that didn’t return) in a manner that fed into the story instead of derailing it. These elements, while good come up against the films big problem: The Plot.

The main issue here is that there are effectively three main stories, that should all intertwine in a way where each one enhances the other, but instead the three threads feel separate and get in each others way. Astrid’s plot provides the opening for the Lydia/Beetlejuice story but in no way intersects with the Delores story and is confined almost entirely to the middle act. It’s hinted that the Delores story factors in to Beetlejuices motivation with Lydia but this is never really explained and ultimately doesn’t change his intentions (He always wanted his wedding). Ultimately, the Delores plot feels entirely detached and just an excuse to place additional disconnected scenes and characters momentarily into the story. Her actual engagement with the rest of the cast is very brief and highly anti-climactic.

Happy Families

Conceptually speaking the Astrid and Delores plots should have had a movie each for it to work, with the Beetlejuice/Lydia story being the focus for a trilogy. Perhaps this was the original plan, but at some point that was abanoned and both plots were squeezed into the one movie. A side effect of this is that Beetlejuice really doesn’t get enough screen time and that is a shame because Keaton was truly on form. It takes about half the movie before he gets properly involved. He’s not alone though in providing a good performance and one surprising highlight is Catherine O’Hara who gains extra screen time largely due to the exclusion of her onscreen husband. Meanwhile, Willem Dafoe’s reminds us that he can do comedy just as well as he does everything else and while his character is sort of pointless, you are glad he is there.

The movies leads though are Winona Ryder and new addition Jenna Ortega. Winona continues her Hollywood comeback she started when she landed her role in Netflix “Stranger Things” and long may it continue. Lydia has changed since she was a child, and is somewhat neurotic, but throughout the film you still feel the young Lydia inside and waiting to come back out. Jenna was an obvious choice for the daughter, since she did so well as Wednesday Addams for the Burton directed Netflix series. While Astrid isn’t a million miles removed from Wednesday, the differences are clear. Astrid has a layer of innocence and naivety that Wednesday does not and Astrid is actually interested in hooking up with boys. She does however have Wednesday’s goth girl sarcasm, but that fits considering how her mother was at her age. The pairing was perfect.

Final Judgement

In conclusion: This is a film that will very likely be both disappointing and enjoyable. It’s an odd combination and almost certainly your mileage will vary. It’s no surprise that reviews of the film have been somewhat split and I am going to land somewhat in the middle. As legacy sequels go, this is more of a win than a loss. This is a film that you want to be fun and it delivers that. That said, a Beetlejuice film can’t just coast by on the humour alone, it needs a solid plot too. The weaknesses with that plot are a lot more noticeable here than with something like Deadpool and Wolverine. On a positive note though, the film doesn’t damage the franchise or any of it’s characters and I don’t think anyone will regret watching.

The original movie is a strong 8.5/10. An all time classic. This sequel just about hits 6/10. That’s a recommend, but not an earth shattering one. Set your expectations accordingly and you will have a good time.