Gladiator II (2024)

Somewhere near the top of the list of sequels I never expected to see is Gladiator II. But Ridley Scott making a return to the Roman Colosseum was also something I wasn’t going to miss, so here we are. The unexpected sequel see’s Scott return as director but this time around the story is by Peter Craig and David Scarpa instead of David Franzoni. Since most of the characters from the original (And sadly two of the actors) are dead, the only returning ones are Connie Nielsen as “Lucilla” and Derek Jocobi as “Senator Gracchus”. They are joined by Paul Mescal as “Lucius/The Barbarian”, Denzel Washington as “Macrinus”, and Pedro Pascal as “Marcus Acadius”. Dual Emperors Geta and Caracalla are played by Joseph Quinn and Fred Hechinger respectively. John Mathieson returns to cinematography duties. Hanz Zimmer however is replaced by regular Scott colaborator Harry Gregson-Williams for the soundtrack.

Set sixteen years after the events of the original, the movie starts with the roman siege of Numidia and the capture of Roman refugee Lucius Verus (Living under the name “Hanno”). Lucius is enslaved and brought to Rome to be a Gladiator. Sensing something in him he can use to further his ambitions the stablemaster, Macinius promises him revenge against the general that took his city and killed his wife. Things are more complicated than they seem though. That general, Aracius, is actually a good man and married to Lucius’ mother Lucilla. Lucius is actually the heir to Rome and was sent away to protect him when he was a child. Sensing an opportunity, Macrinus tries to manipulate all the sides against each other in an attempt to seize power from the dual Emperors Geta and Carcalla.

The Gates Of Hell Are Open Night And Day

One of the things that made Gladiator so compelling was that it was actually a pretty straight forward yet compelling plot driven by superb ground breaking action and incredible performances from top tier actors, many of which were at their peak (Notable Russel Crowe). It wasn’t a perfect movie, but issues of historical inaccuracies felt unimportant next to such a triumphant performance. This was all wrapped up in one of the best movie soundtracks of all time. So we knew when they announced the sequel there were some pretty big boots to fill. Sequels rarely ever live totally up to the original, though the audiences are wise enough not to expect them to. But it is impossible not to draw comparisons especially given the trend of sequels to constantly reference the originals. This is even more of an issue for those late sequels released decades after the original.

Overcoming that comparison is where this movie fails. As I mentioned, the original had a straight forward plot. A great wrong was done to Maximus. He was betrayed and the rest of the movie is his journey towards righteous vengeance. The story for Gladiator II seems set up to be both a parallel and a subversion of this story. It’s not a bad plot, but it is far more complicated than Gladiator and this reduces the emotional impact of the story. It is a story that would be better suited to a TV series than a film. On top of this, frankly the acting is nowhere near as good. Again, it’s not actually bad and Denzel steals the show, but he had no real competition. The original had Richard Harris, Oliver Reed, Joaquin Phoenix and Russel Crowe all weaving gold. Here Denzel is largely propping the rest of the cast up.

Smooth The Descent

Gladiator 2 has another issue. Creating a story that makes sense as a follow up to one where protagonist and antagonist both died. They just about succeed. Some consider there to be a few too many callbacks, but it makes sense in context and to justify it as a sequel. Scott has taken a lot of liberties with history here, but then he did with the first film too. The story utilizes historical facts and characters, but twists them to fit his tale. It mostly works at least as an alternative history. The movie steals much of the music from the soundtrack of the original too, but this is a positive. The score for the original is famous and memorable. Referencing such music instantly evokes an emotion response. It is a reference that works and doesn’t get in the way of storytelling. Instead it enhances it.

What I can say about the plot is that it is very Roman! Remember all that political maneuvering and backstabbing from Game of Thrones? The Romans invented that. So while I do consider the plot overly complicated for an emotional character driven action fantasy, it entirely fits a story set in Rome. The characters are a bit more of a let down. Outside of the protagonist none of the Gladiators really feel like full characters. The same goes for the Roman senate and the military. Instead the film effectively hyper focuses on three characters: Lucius, Lucilla and Macrinus. Everyone else around them are pretty much just extras including the duel Emperors Geta and Caracalla and Pablo Pascal’s Marcus Acacius. None of them offer anything that memorable in their performance. Pascal seems to be trying, but the audience isn’t really given any reason to care about his character.

Easy Is The Way

Last but not least, let’s talk action. This was a key aspect of the original and it was always going to be vital here too. In this instance the movie doesn’t really make you feel the stakes as strongly, but the spectacle is certainly there. Of all the movies aspects this comes closest to the quality of the original. The only problem is this is 24 years later and we’ve seen a lot of spectacle since then. Indeed just recently the TV series “Those About To Die” had the Colosseum filled with water. The set piece in that series was a simple execution and not a battle, but it does make the spectacle feel less ground breaking. Still, I was happy with the quality of the action and the effects. It was as good as I hoped.

So on to the verdict then. Ultimately this is a good film, but it’s not a classic like the original. If it was a stand alone movie it wouldn’t make my physical media collection but as a sequel it is just about good enough for a double bill. While the story is a little over complicated and the acting and characters a little under whelming, I was reasonably gripped for the duration (Two and a half hours, about the same as the first film). Denzel Washington does a good job of propping everyone else up and is the glue that keeps this warship sailing. It all just about works. It just doesn’t excel. So I’m giving this a firm 6.5/10.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

The Equalizer 3 (2023)

For today’s review I’m stepping away from horror and film noir and checking out the recently released “The Equalizer 3”. This sees star Denzel Washington reunite with his favourite director Antoine Fuqua for the third installment in his race swapped Equalizer reboot series. I never really figured out why they decided to make the first film as a reboot of an 80’s TV series franchise most people didn’t even know. It always seemed to me there was more clout from having Denzel than their was from the franchise. It’s particularly puzzling since they dramatically changed the character and the franchise as a whole. At this point it’s only the name and the name of the protagonist that has any ties to the original. Ultimately though it doesn’t matter since the first two installments were really good. Anyway, let’s see if this one holds up to the others!

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing.

Our movie starts with Robert McCall (Washington) taking out a Mafia stronghold, to recover something (What is revealed at the end and is not relevant to the main plot, though it is to the character of McCall). While leaving he is shot by the grandson of the Mafia boss. Being a good guy McCall naturally didn’t want to kill a child and this left him injured and even considering taking his own life. In the end though he drives off, but falls unconscious somewhere along the Amalfi Coast and is rescued by Gio Bonucci (Eugenio Mastrandrea), a local carabiniere. Bonucci brings him to the remote coastal town of Altamonte, where he is treated by small-town doctor Enzo Arisio (Remo Girone).

As McCall recovers he grows attached to this little town and it’s people. He perhaps considers making his retirement permanent here. However it becomes apparent the local Mafia has plans for the town and it’s relentless shakedown of the working people there is part of a greater scheme. To protect this little pocket of paradise he has found, McCall must go back to what he knows and start equalizing things. Eventually he will have to face off the local Mafia boss, but he must also protect the town people.

Small Town Charms.

This is not an action film. This is the first thing to take into consideration because it doesn’t really work as an action film. Robert McCall is basically an unstoppable killing machine, so as an action film it would need a real physical threat to our hero and this film doesn’t find one. Instead it is a drama story book-ended by two major action scenes and with one very small action scene towards the end of the second act. In some ways it would make a good superhero film and it’s interesting because it does remind me a lot of Spider-Man 2. Specifically how the turning point in that movie is regular New Yorkers stepping up to defend Spider-Man. In the same way the town folk step up to help McCall, saving his life and effectively allowing him to do what he does.

While this is mostly a drama, the action that is there is well done. It’s nothing that wouldn’t be out of place in the first two movies. However the strength of this movie is in the heartwarming retired hero finds a home story. We get to see day to day life in a picturesque Amalfi Coast town and it is certainly charming. Italians love to socialise and this makes it impossible for McCall to stay aloof from things, he can’t help but love the place. After being nursed back to health there Robert it seems wants to stay. So when the village is threatened by the Mafia he has to stand in their way. It’s a very simple story. The side plot with CIA Agent Emma Collins is almost irrelevant. With or without that larger criminal activity, McCall would still need to protect the town.

Conclusion.

I have mixed feelings about this film. I can’t help but feel plot wise there is pretty much nothing here, at least not in the case of genuine stakes and plot that feels important. Yet, what is here works well. Perhaps it is a triumph for character focused storytelling. Perhaps it is proof that the charm of a small town is pretty much irresistible. Then again maybe it’s just Denzel Washington. He is after all one of the last genuine movie stars out there. Anyway, I’m giving this film a 6.5/10. About on par with the previous more action orientated sequel and a notch below the original film (Which is a strong 7/10).

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.