Wait Until Dark (1967)

For tonight’s movie we’re going for more of a psychological thriller than an outright horror (Though it is X rated). This is the 1967 Audrey Hepburn classic “Wait Until Dark”. This was Hepburn’s final movie of her main run of movie stardom, after which she decided to semi-retire and she wouldn’t return to the screen until nine years later with 1976’s Robin and Marian (Which is a fantastic film btw, with Sean Connery as Robin). Wait Until Dark won her nominations for the Golden Globes and Academy Awards for best actress (Losing out to Katharine Hepburn).

Her main support in the movie comes from Richard Crenna, who most movie fans will know as Rambo’s only friend Trautman, but alongside Crenna is Alan Arkin and Jack Weston. The movie is helmed by long time James Bond director Terence Young and is based on a Frederick Knott play (Likely why this is mostly a one room story).

October Review Challenge – Day 28

The movie begins with an altercation at an airport. A woman named Lisa (Samantha Jones) is smuggling heroin inside an old-fashioned doll, but is spooked by the presence of a man at the airport. She gives the doll to a man Sam Hendrix (Efrem Zimbalist Jr.) for safe keeping with some story about it being a gift she wants to keep secret, with the intention of picking it up later. A few days later a pair of conmen, Mike (Crenna) and Carlino (Weston) arrive at the apartment of Sam and his blind wife, Susy (Hepburn) believing it to be Lisa’s residence.

The pair are surprised by the arrival of Harry Roat (The man from the airport) who tries to convince them to help locate the doll. They discover the corpse of Lisa and Roat blackmails them (As their prints are all over the house by now) to assist him in disposing of the body and then finding the Doll. The criminals assume the doll is either hidden somewhere, or possibly locked in the a safe that is in the front room. The group then engages in an elaborate con scheme to trick Sam’s wife Susy into revealing to doll’s location and/or opening the safe where they think it is being stored. As part of their con they have taken over a nearby phone booth so they can use it as a fake contact number.

Taking Advantage.

The scheme relies heavily on taking advantage of the fact that Susy is blind. However as the evening goes on she starts to become suspicious and she is aided by Gloria (Julie Herrod), a young girl that lives in the flat upstairs and occasionally helps susy with chores who is able to see the men use the telephone booth from her window upstairs. Unfortunately she is a little too trusting in Mike who had been posing as an old friend of her husbands and before she realises he is in on the scheme she admits that she now has the doll (Gloria had spotted it earlier and had “borrowed” it). She quickly hides and then sends him on a wild goose chase to her husbands office a few streets away.

Unfortunately some of the crew have remained outside to watch the building, so she is still trapped. Out of desperation she sends Gloria to meet her husband at the bus station (where he will be returning to imminently) and starts to prepare the apartment to make it more difficult for them on their return, mostly involving breaking all the lights. When Mike returns the situation changes drastically as allies turn on each other and it looks like Susie may be at the mercy of the psychopathic Mr. Roat. No more spoilers though, you will have to watch to find out how this all ends.

Oscar Worthy Performance?

The obvious thing to note here is the quality of Hepburn’s performance. She lost out on the Oscar to Katharine Hepburn for “Look Whose Coming to Dinner” and I can’t help but feel Katharine as great an actress as she was, won that award by virtue of the movies perceived importance and the popularity of her pairing with Spencer Tracy. Take that out of the picture and I can’t help but feel Audrey was cheated. I have never seen a more convincing performance from someone that isn’t blind playing a blind person. She didn’t do it with the benefit of sunglasses either, so every moment she is on screen she had to convince the viewer with her eyes that she couldn’t see and she does it so well it didn’t even feel like an act.

It’s interesting that blind characters seem to be the last thing in Hollywood that can be played by someone that doesn’t have that specific issue. Hollywood insists on casting actually deaf actors as deaf characters, but when it comes to blind ones it seems fair game. Not sure how long that will continue but even while it continues I doubt someone could do a better job than Audrey did here. Outside of acting blind she puts forth the characters good nature, her struggles with her disability and the sheer terror of the situation incredibly well. However, while I have nothing but praise for the performance the character herself comes across as almost naive in her good nature and far too trusting.

The Villains.

There is a solid performance here from Richard Crena too as the primary antagonist and most likeable of the bunch. You feel he is warming to Susy while also becoming frustrated with her. Good job the chemistry was there since the majority of the film is just him and Hepburn. Alan Arkin as the dangerous Mr. Roat however is a more interesting case. He plays his character over the top, almost like a comic book villain but the interesting thing here is that were he to appear in a movie or TV show these days no one would bat an eyelid to it. Indeed the character would probably be praised.

The strangely nonchalant psycho is a mainstay of modern fiction, for example the show “Mr. Robot” was packed to the brim with characters just like Roat. Back in the 60’s however, his performance seemed out of place. Jack Weston as Carlino is largely just there, but doesn’t harm the film. There was however one very minor (uncredited) role of a character called “Shatner” early on that stood out for notably poor acting, but the moment passed quickly and character didn’t return.

Sound and Story

Another strong aspect of this movie is the Henry Mancini soundtrack. While a good part of it is standard Mancini with a somewhat romantic tone, there are good portions of it that make use of discordant harmonies and somewhat off tunings. It is perhaps a bit of an evolution from Mancini’s “Experiment in Terror” soundtrack, but I feel perhaps with a bit of an influence from Bernard Herrmann’s psycho thrown in for good measure. One of the best things about watching movies from the 60’s is getting to hear soundtracks like this.

The plot is perhaps a weakness. The story relies heavily on the actors to raise it up since the truth is not a huge amount goes on here. There isn’t a great deal of character development and no plot twists so to speak. It is simply a matter of Susy slowly figuring out what is going on around her but even when she figures it out there is little she can do other than try and survive the night. The game of cat and mouse is entertaining to watch though in places you need a great deal of suspension of disbelief. Ultimately though the performances trump the failings in the story and make the tension feel real enough to ignore a few plot holes. The film does drag a bit in the middle though, but not drastically.

The Fear Factor.

In regard to it’s horor based aspects, Susy goes full “Final Girl” at the end and we have three murders throughout the night, including the classic discovery of a corpse in a wardrobe. One of the murders involving vehicular manslaughter was outright brutal and while not featuring gore does involve the guy running back and forwards over the body. I can see how the movie got an X rating. Compared to modern horrors it’s not that intense but it does satisfy in the same way an 80’s final girl survival does. That’s not to say this is really a horror, since the majority of the film is just two-three people talking in a room (Well it is based on a play).

Conclusion.

This was always going to be a movie made or broken by it’s lead. Fortunately it’s the former. There wasn’t quite enough to the story to hit a truly high score here but it definitely deserves a spot in this October’s 7/10 club and probably deserved the Best Actress Oscar too, but that’s the Oscars for you.

Rating: 7 out of 10.

Lifeforce (1985)

For tonight’s movie I’m going back to the 80’s for a movie I somehow missed back in the day, the Tobe Hooper directed sci-fi vampire movie from 1985 “Life Force”. Based on Colin Wilson’s book “The Space Vampires” and adapted into a screenplay by the great Dan O’Bannon (Writer on “Alien”, “Return of the Living Dead” and “Total Recall” as well as one of last Octobers films “Dead and Buried”). The other name of note behind the screen is Henry Mancini providing the score, not a name I expected to see on an 80’s science fiction horror.

The film stars Steve Rallsback as Col. Tom Carlsen and Peter Firth as Col. Colin Caine, with support from Frank Finlay as Dr. Hans Fallada, Mathilda May as the Space Vampire Girl and has little cameo from Patrick Stewart (Who popped up in a lot of sci-fi and fantasy even before Star Trek). Let’s dig in to the plot summary (Which has some spoilers, but doesn’t blow the ending). Be aware this is a dense plot and I’m compacting it for the summary (So it may sound rushed).

October Review Challenge – Day 13

The movie begins with the Space Shuttle “Curchill” discovering a derelict ship while investigating Hailey’s Comet. On inspection they find the bodies of bat like creatures and three humanoids (including one particularly attractive female), in suspended animation. The crew decide to bring these back to Earth but on the way mission control loses contact with the ship.

A rescue mission discovers the ship has been gutted by fire, the escape pod is missing but the three alien humanoids are intact and so at taken to earth. On Earth the female alien awakens and drains the life force out of a guard before escaping. The other two aliens similarly revive but appear to get blown up by grenades. It seems though every victim of this female vampire would return from the dead two hours later and be compelled to feed on another life form or turn to dust, then in turn any they feed on will also turn. Effectively putting a zombie like element into the film. Col Caine of the S.A.S. is called in to take charge of the situation.

Space Vampires From Space!

Meanwhile the escape pod touches down in Texas with Col. Carsen inside. Carsen is flown to London where he explains what happened to the crew (Short story, it never ends well for people transferring vampires to a new home), but through hypnotism they learn that he has a psychic connection to the female vampire and they utilise this to try and track her down.

It is discovered that these vampires can move into other bodies, meaning all three are still alive and in new bodies. Fortunately though Dr. Fallada has found a way to kill them. This leads us to the final act, where the Vampires ship has moved into an orbit above London and it seems the whole thing is about collecting human souls. Carsen and Caine must stop them before it’s too late.

Quatermass and the Soul Thieves

While watching the movie it was clear to me what Hooper was going for and that was a Quatermass style British sci-fi. Indeed so much so, I had to check if Nigel Kneale was involved somewhere (He wasn’t). If you aren’t familiar with the franchise, it was originally created by Kneale in the 1950’s for the BBC and ran as three separate serials all with a sci-fi/horror theme. Bernard Quatermass was the central character of these.

Sadly most of these are lost or in a bad state due to the BBC not looking after their archived material back in the day. However Hammer Studios remade all three serials as movies between 1955 and 1967 and these are generally what people think of when they talk about Quatermass. The final movie “Quatermass and the Pit” is probably the most famous and it’s a real cracker!

Style and Substance

As it happens I’m not the first person to notice this similarity and it seems in interviews with Hooper, this was exactly what he was going for. Apparently as soon as the deal was done he was determined to make a Hammer style film. That may explain the very British cast and setting and also why the movies conclusion is so similar to that of Quatermass and the Pitt.

As a Quatermass/Kneale fan I appreciate the style and flow of the movie. The plot while perhaps a little over complicated does it’s job and allows for a steady flow of information and increase of dramatic tension. However against this there is the characters and I can’t say I found any of them particularly interesting. Col. Carlsen has no real personality outside his obsession with the Lady Vampire and while Peter Firth attempts his best Quatermass, but the character doesn’t have the strength of personality to really work. It felt like Carsen was the lead in this, but it probably should have been Caine.

Epic Space Opera

The soundtrack is as I expected, rather good. It does however push much more in the direction of epic science fiction than horror. It’s interesting to note that James Horner was originally down to do the score, but was replaced by Mancini who then created a soundtrack very similar to Horner’s work. That’s not to say that it is a rip off, it’s a bit smoother and less aggressive than Horner’s space operas, but it is just very much of that 1980’s epic space adventure feel.

Honestly, if you get a chance just listen to the soundtrack sometime, then you can really appreciate it (I’m listening while writing this review). While it gains points for quality, I’m not convinced it was the best fit for a movie that was really a lot more down to earth than the “Space Vampires” premise may lead you to believe.

Right Film, Wrong Time?

I can’t help but feel though that 1985 was probably not the right time for this kind of a movie. Some of the effects have aged badly (though not a big issue for me) and perhaps would have been better had the film been made in the 90’s, but the audience would probably have been more susceptible to a Quatermass style of film in the 1970’s. I have no doubt the audiences in 1985 did not want this and no doubt it is why the movie flopped, but fortunately over time it has found an audience to appreciate it and become a cult hit.

Conclussion

Overall, I have to say I liked the film, but it’s one I can see not being everyone’s cup of tea and ultimately I won’t be adding this to my physical media collection. I like the style, I love the music and I quite like the plot, but I don’t care about any of the characters so I can’t push this up to a 7/10. I think this just about hits the 6.5 mark.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.